![]() The court’s three liberals, in dissent, accused the conservative majority of failing to consider “the potentially deadly consequences of its decision.” ![]() The ruling’s broad sweep amounts to a complete overhaul of the court’s Second Amendment doctrine and is expected to call into question a wide range of other gun laws, according to legal experts. And it is not how the Second Amendment works when it comes to public carry for self-defense.” It is not how the Sixth Amendment works when it comes to a defendant’s right to confront the witnesses against him. “That is not how the First Amendment works when it comes to unpopular speech or the free exercise of religion. “We know of no other constitutional right that an individual may exercise only after demonstrating to government officers some special need,” Thomas wrote for the majority. In striking down the law, the court’s conservatives ruled that the so-called proper-cause requirement prevented “law-abiding citizens with ordinary self-defense needs from exercising their right to keep and bear arms.” The New York law at issue required concealed carry permit applicants to demonstrate a special need for a license, beyond a basic desire for self-defense. The ruling broke along ideological lines, with the court’s six conservatives joining a majority opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas, who wrote that the Second Amendment protects “an individual’s right to carry a handgun for self-defense outside the home.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |